How FFPs Impact Superstar Players Payroll
Football is one of the most popular sports globally, with devotees from every corner
of the globe. Professional European football teams have maintained the sport's long-held
tradition of European origin and dominance in the sport to this day. Top-level players like
Cristiano Ronaldo and David Beckham have come out of European leagues and clubs;
professionals from other areas have been lured to Europe by the great pay and benefits on
offer. European football teams have sometimes found themselves in financial trouble or
suffered massive losses despite their success. Most European clubs have benefited from the
rise of broadcasting technology in recent decades, but their financial situation has not
improved.
Eurovision, the European Football Association, introduced new regulations in 2010
designed to put more discipline and rationale into European football clubs' finances. The
primary goal of this program was to prevent European football teams from experiencing
financial losses by spending more than they make in their pursuit of tremendous success
(Müller et al., 18). This rule also specifies the sanctions that will be taken against teams who
overspend across many seasons. Disqualification from UEFA tournaments is the most severe
sanction. In addition, the prize money will be withheld, and the player will be barred from
Surname 2
making any transfers. Since its inception, the Financial Fair Play (FFP) rule has been widely
derided for restricting a club's expenditure on salaries and transfers compared to the income it
generates from football-related operations. To put it simply, this regulation restricts the
amount of money invested directly by football club owners. When the FFP laws are
completely applied, most clubs will reduce player pay. Players and their representatives
would be harmed by such a policy, who get a cut of what the player makes.
Background of Financial Fair Play (FFP)
More than 330 professional football teams in Europe out of the total 655 clubs
sustained varied losses throughout the years, and only a tiny fraction could bear the loss,
depending on the wealth of their owners. Of the examined organizations, 20 percent were
deemed in genuine danger. The study found those club owners were confident in their
abilities as managers and their plans for the future of their clubs. Owners like these, who had
just a secondary school education, could see that there was no direct link between the salaries
of their teams and the number of victories they had. As few teams were able to attain the
success they aspired to, they grew to borrow money to succeed. It has been reported that
several club directors borrowed money to pursue their dreams of grandeur, only to fail
subsequently and not produce any long-term results. FC Porto, AC Milan, and Juventus are a
few examples (under their previous owners)
Even though the European top clubs' boards have always justified their extravagant
spending as a necessary measure to keep the club competitive, the consequences have been
disastrous for most teams. It was agreed with by the director of Bundesliga, adding that they
have learned from experience not only in Europe but also all over the globe that club
executives prefer to take risky investments by overestimating their prospects in the
championship. Because of this, the club can spend more money than it makes because of this
Surname 3
sort of spending. As a result, the proprietors of nightclubs need to be safeguarded (Fernandes,
312).
Most of the debt is owned by the three most essential leagues: the Premier League in
England, Serie A in Italy, and Primera Division, more generally known as La Liga in Spain
(Spanish League). Although most football supporters like seeing their team spend money on
great players, Michael Platini believes that these practices deplete the club's natural legacy
and might lead to the extinction of European football in the future (Barsch, 227). According
to UEFA, an official policy of FFP licensing would require any team wishing to compete in
UEFA competitions to fulfill the FFP conditionality. The Club Financial Control Body, a new
UEFA administration, will supervise and execute the FFP. Further, the Club Financial
Control Body would be separated into an investigative chamber and an adjudicatory chamber.
