By Day 3 of Week 1 Post a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.

March 21, 2010, was not EBP’s date of birth, but it may be the date the approach “grew up” and left home to take on the world.

When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it came with a requirement of empirical evidence. Research on EBP increased significantly. Application of EBP spread to allied health professions, education, healthcare technology, and more. Health organizations began to adopt and promote EBP.

 

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by visiting the websites they shared and offering additional examples of EBP or alternative views/interpretations to those shared in your colleagues’ posts.

Expert Answer and Explanation

My selected website is the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website. CMS is a federal agency under the Department of Health and Human Services tasked with administering the Medicare program and also works with the different states to administer Medicaid (CMS, n.d.). The website provides different kinds of helpful information to both enrollees of either program (Medicare and Medicaid) and the public.

According to Melnyk et al. (2010), evidence-based practice is a problem-solving approach that applies the best evidence from valid and verifiable research, patient data, and clinician expertise to inform patient-care delivery. From my analysis of the CMS website, there were various areas where evidence-based practice appeared. For example, the website has detailed information on COVID-19 and the vaccination approved by the FDA supported by evidence-based data, which is made available to the public and the beneficiaries of the Medicare and Medicaid services. The website also provides different forms of assessment information which compiles evidence from patient data on different performance metrics, for example, the Medicaid & CHIP Scorecard. The different packages offered by the organization as described on the website are also backed by evidence.

From the general outlook of the website, the work done by CMS is purely grounded on EBP. The organization caters to different public healthcare needs, which require the backing of proven statistics and evidence on best practices. For example, the Basic Health Program incorporates statistics from different state agencies, including the Census Bureau and the CDC, to advise the program’s implementation, including administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. Without EBP, the CMS would be operating at a loss given that it may not have a proper estimation of where it needs to focus its interventions, the budget estimates for its interventions, and the expected outcomes that also inform its scorecard reports. The application of evidence facilitates continuous improvement efforts in reducing health care costs and improving the quality of care for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries which goes a long way in realizing quadruple aims (Sikka et al., 2015).

Based on the information discovered from the CMS website, my perception of the organization has improved. The positive perception is due to the evident inclusion of EBP in the different activities conducted by the organization.

Reference

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) (n.d.). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/

Melnyk, B.M., Fineout-Overhold, E., Stillwell, S.B., & Williamson, K.M. (2010). Evidence-based practice step-by-step: The seven steps of evidence-based practice. American Journal of Nursing, 110(1), 51-53.

Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost, and meaning in work. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24, 608–610. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004160